The Impact of Work Technology on Worker Behaviour: A Case Study of the Golden Guinea Breweries Limited Umuahia

!lnrk and its d p n m i c s have almys heen o f i n t e r e s t
t o man, T h i s swnn t o he s o h e c n ~ ~ite is t h r~u s t
i n p o r t a n t f n c t o s t h a t d i s t ? n q u i n h e s man from o t h e r animals,
Man is p s i n n s i l y n ~dcrker, a h u i l d e r ,
Such i n t c r e a t s hnve focused on t h e prohlem; and
p o s s i b i l i t y of cff i c f ~ n tan d e f f e c t i v e i n d u s t r i a l
o r g a n i m t i a n . It has focused on p r o d u c t i v i t y ; it3
nrnblerns nnd t h r~e l e v a n t f a c t n r s t h n t w i l l b r i n g a b o u t
i n c r e a s e d p r o d u c t i v i t y , Such concmn has given rise t o
various experiments on p r o d u c t i v i t y .
Cther areas o f i n t e r e s t have been i n t h e worker who
is more fmpnrtant i n production. Such works have cencant
r n t c d on t h c impact nf h i s o r i e n t n t i o n , h i s &el of
s a t i s f & c t i o n on p r o d u c t i v i t y .
In n u r arm C ~ P r,ap hnve l a o k e d a t a d i f f e r e n t
a s p e c t nf t h e rmrk~r i n an i n d u s t r i a l o r g a n k i o t i n n , Ne
hnvc l o o k c d n t t h e lnpnc:t o f tnc.hnoloqy nf ~ o s kon t h e
b e h a v i o u r o f t h 1~40~ ( :@l?, 'Je assrmE t h a t t e c h n o l o g y shap-rco
t h e environment i n tllhich mark goes on. En t h e o t h e r hand, it can i n f l u e n c e t h e d i s p o s i t i o n nf t h e rmrknr t n p e r f n r n
or otherwise,!lnrk and its d p n m i c s have almys heen o f i n t e r e s t
t o man, T h i s swnn t o he s o h e c n ~ ~ite is t h r~u s t
i n p o r t a n t f n c t o s t h a t d i s t ? n q u i n h e s man from o t h e r animals,
Man is p s i n n s i l y n ~dcrker, a h u i l d e r ,
Such i n t c r e a t s hnve focused on t h e prohlemr; and
p o s s i b i l i t y of cff i c f ~ n tan d e f f e c t i v e i n d u s t r i a l
o r g a n i m t i a n . It has focused on p r o d u c t i v i t y ; it3
nrnblerns nnd t h r~e l e v a n t f a c t n r s t h n t w i l l b r i n g a b o u t
i n c r e a s e d p r o d u c t i v i t y , Such concmn has given rise t o
various experiments on p r o d u c t i v i t y .
Cther areas o f i n t e r e s t have been i n t h e worker who
is more fmpnrtant i n production. Such works have cencant
r n t c d on t h c impact nf h i s o r i e n t n t i o n , h i s &el of
s a t i s f & c t i o n on p r o d u c t i v i t y .
In n u r arm C ~ P r,ap hnve l a o k e d a t a d i f f e r e n t
a s p e c t nf t h e rmrk~r i n an i n d u s t r i a l o r g a n k i o t i n n , Ne
hnvc l o o k c d n t t h e lnpnc:t o f tnc.hnoloqy nf ~ o s kon t h e
b e h a v i o u r o f t h 1~40~ ( :@l?, 'Je assrmE t h a t t e c h n o l o g y shap-rco
t h e environment i n tllhich mark goes on. En t h e o t h e r hand,
it can i n f l u e n c e t h e d i s p o s i t i o n nf t h e rmrknr t n p e r f n r n
or otherwise,